Legal Opinion

Brown v. Spiegel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1909No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Gage (William G.), J. Assumpsit by Harry R. Brown against Frederick F. Spiegel upon certain promissory notes. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff commenced suit by writ of attachment, under which a levy was made upon a large amount of personal and real estate belonging to defendant. The suit was brought to recover the amount due on two certain promissory notes given by defendant to plaintiff July 12 and September 10, 1904. On November 21, 1904, after these notes were given, defendant sent plaintiff a letter, inclosing certain notes made and executed by various parties to one J. T. Davis, which were by Davis indorsed to defendant, and by defendant indorsed to plaintiff. These notes were received and kept by plaintiff, and some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kirksey v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  2. Acme Manufacturing Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Gardner v. LloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Floyd v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Henderson v. MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hewett Grocery Co. v. Biddle Purchasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Steinmetz v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Madden v. MaddenMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Brown v. SpiegelMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API