Legal Opinion

Barahona v. Trustees of Columbia University

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Donald Scott Kurtz, J.

*1036Defendant moves pursuant to CPLR 3122, 3124 and 3126 to compel production of discovery or preclude plaintiff or strike plaintiff’s complaint for failure to comply with its discovery demand.

Plaintiff claims that he was performing construction work on defendant’s premises on May 18, 2001. The complaint alleges that defendant violated Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1) and § 241 (6) and that plaintiff sustained personal injury as a result thereof. In the course of discovery, defendant conducted plaintiffs examination before trial on April 22, 2004. However,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Balbuena v. IDR REALTY LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Mazur v. Rock-McGraw, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Oro v. 23 East 79th Street Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salas v. Hi-Tech ErectorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Salas v. Hi-Tech ErectorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API