Legal Opinion

Graham v. McKinney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 27, 1984No. 82-577PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case arose from a dispute between coterminous land owners over the boundaries separating their property. Appellants, plaintiffs below, contend that the trial court's decree establishing the coterminous boundaries is erroneous as a matter of law. We affirm.

The Grahams' (appellants') land lies immediately northeast of the McKinneys' (appellees') land. The disputed boundaries are a north-south line, and an east-west line running east from the southern point of the north-south line.

The Grahams purchased their property in August of 1979. About six months later, the McKinneys purchased their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Bryan v. W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Baldwin v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Stansell v. TharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Ray v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Helms v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Nelson v. StyronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Holifield v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. Jones v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Carr v. RozelleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API