Graham v. McKinney
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This case arose from a dispute between coterminous land owners over the boundaries separating their property. Appellants, plaintiffs below, contend that the trial court's decree establishing the coterminous boundaries is erroneous as a matter of law. We affirm.
The Grahams' (appellants') land lies immediately northeast of the McKinneys' (appellees') land. The disputed boundaries are a north-south line, and an east-west line running east from the southern point of the north-south line.
The Grahams purchased their property in August of 1979. About six months later, the McKinneys purchased their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Bryan v. W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Baldwin v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Stansell v. TharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Ray v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Helms v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Nelson v. StyronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Holifield v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Jones v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Carr v. RozelleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.