Carr v. Rozelle

MADDOX, Justice.

This is a boundary line dispute. The plaintiffs, Albert and Majorie Rozelle, sued Oscar and Ruby Carr, claiming that the Carrs had trespassed and cut timber on their property.

The Rozelles asked the court to set the proper boundary line between their properties; they also sought $3,500 in damages.

The dispute between the parties concerns the location of the northern boundary line of the Rozelles’ property, which is the southern boundary line of the Carrs’ property.

A section line divides the two properties. The Carrs contend they own land to a point south of the section line. The…