State v. Starks
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The appeal raises these two issues:(1) Is sec. 947.02 (2), Stats., unconstitutional on its face; and(2) Did the state fail to prove one of the elements of the crime?
We approach the issue of constitutionality mindful of the fundamental presumptions and rules of construction which run in favor of upholding a statute challenged on constitutional grounds. All legislative acts are presumed constitutional, and every presumption must be indulged to sustain the law if at all possible. If any doubt exists, it must be resolved in favor of the constitutionality of a statute.
When a statute is challenged…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Aptheker v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Staub v. City of BaxleySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Hezzie R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Milwaukee v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.