Legal Opinion

Snuffer v. Karr

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 19, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from DeKalb Circuit Court. — Now. A. D. Burnes, Judge. (1) The written statement of conclusions of facts- and law becomes a part of the record proper, and if the finding of facts does not support the judgment based thereon, this court should and will reverse judgment for error apparent on the record. Stutter v. Streit, 21 Mo. 157; Allison v. Darton, 24 Mo. 343; Nichols v. Carter, 49 Mo. App. 401; Land Co. v. Breitz, 125 Mo. 418; Freeman v. Hemenway, 75 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from DeKalb Circuit Court. — Now. A. D. Burnes, Judge. (1) The written statement of conclusions of facts- and law becomes a part of the record proper, and if the finding of facts does not support the judgment based thereon, this court should and will reverse judgment for error apparent on the record. Stutter v. Streit, 21 Mo. 157; Allison v. Darton, 24 Mo. 343; Nichols v. Carter, 49 Mo. App. 401; Land Co. v. Breitz, 125 Mo. 418; Freeman v. Hemenway, 75 Mo. App. 621. (2) The finding of the facts in this case as made and filed herein by the court does not support or justify the…

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This is an action for the recovery and admeasurement of dower. Plaintiff; claims to be *185the widow of Isaac F. Snuffer. Upon motion of the defendant, who through mesne conveyances, claimed a fee simple title through a deed signed hy Isaac F. Snuffer, alone, a finding of facts was made by the trial court. This finding of facts is well supported by the evidence unless it is in some way shattered by reason of a statute of the State of Tennessee, which was introduced in evidence. The finding of facts which is, and was as a matter of fact, made a part of the judgment herein, is as follows:

“1. That…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gall v. . GallNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Loewen v. ForseeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. State Bank v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Nichols v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Andrews v. PageTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Maier v. BrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Davidson v. ReamNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Feehley v. FeehleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  4. Johnson v. St. Joseph Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Wisdom v. KeithleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API