Legal Opinion

Auld v. Colonial Stores Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1947No. 31675, 31685PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first headnote is a statement of a portion of the statutory law on the question of suits for malicious prosecution, and needs no elaboration.

Where there is probable cause, a suit for malicious prosecution cannot be maintained. Our Code (§ 105-802), provides that the want of probable cause shall exist when the circumstances are such as to satisfy a reasonable man that the accuser had no ground for proceeding but his desire to injure the accused. But this is not exhaustive of all the instances of probable cause. Coleman v. Allen, 79 Ga. 637, 642 (5 S. E.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daniel v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Coleman v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Carter v. Howe Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  5. Gillett v. Missouri Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Sanfrantello v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Willis v. BrassellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Day Realty Associates, Inc. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API