Legal Opinion

Edwards v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2000No. 79A02-9901-CR-64PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Pamela Edwards appeals her conviction for Exploitation of an Endangered Adult, 1 a Class A misdemeanor. Specifically, Edwards argues that: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of uncharged misconduct; (2) the trial court improperly allowed the State’s expert witness to render an opinion that was speculative and prejudicial to Edwards; (3) the jury verdicts are inconsistent and, therefore, the trial court erred by not granting her motion for final judgment on the evidence; and, (4) the evidence is insufficient.

FACTS

The facts most favorable…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Swanson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Strack and Van Til, Inc. v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. LaQuantis Johnson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Peters v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Ludina Roshida Wallace v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Merchant v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API