Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1961No. Crim. 1470PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Defendants appeal from judgments of conviction of conspiracy to commit theft and attempted grand theft. They also appeal from orders denying their motion for a new trial.

The evidence discloses that defendants attempted to steal money from Lewis Compton by means of a confidence scheme known as the “Jamaican switch.” According to the testimony of a police officer who qualified as an expert on the subject, the Jamaican switch is a method by which two or more Negro confidence men induce a victim, who is also a Negro, to withdraw money from a bank and then deprive him of it by switching envelopes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. DabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. LinyardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. BeverlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. De ArklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. In Re AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API