Legal Opinion

People v. Linyard

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1957No. Crim. 3322PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Robert Linyard and two others, a man and a woman, were charged with illegal possession of heroin in violation of section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code. Linyard, prior to trial, admitted to three prior narcotic convictions. All three pleaded not guilty. Prior to trial the female defendant changed her plea to guilty. The two remaining accused were jointly tried before a jury. Linyard was found guilty and his codefendant not guilty. Linyard appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the finding…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. ZerilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. De GeorgioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API