Whether Members of the Sentencing Commission Who Were Appointed Prior to the Enactment of a Holdover Statute May Exercise Holdover Rights Pursuant to the Statute
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel
1Opinion of the Court
Whether Members of the Sentencing Commission Who Were Appointed Prior to the Enactment of a Holdover Statute May Exercise Holdover Rights Pursuant to the Statute S ta tu to ry p ro v is io n s th a t allo w m e m b e rs o f the U n ited S ta te s S e n te n c in g C o m m is sio n to h o ld o v e r in o ffic e a fte r th e ir term s h av e e x p ire d a p p ly to in c u m b e n t m e m b e rs w h o w ere a p p o in te d p rio r to the e n a c tm e n t o f th e h o ld o v e r s tatu te C o m m is sio n e rs w h o w ere a p p o in te d p n o r to th e e n a c tm e n t o f the h o ld o v e r…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.