United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSON, District Judge.
The Government seeks enforcement of the statutory penalty against the defendant railroad company for allegedly hauling or using on its line a car which was out of repair or not properly equipped, relying upon 45 U.S.C.A. § 13 and other provisions of the Safety Appliance Acts referred to therein. 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 to 16, inclusive. The case has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts. Union Pacific Railroad Company on February 25, 1959, acting on its own behalf and not on behalf of the defendant Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Baltimore & O. S. W. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Southern Ry. Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
- United States v. Toledo, Peoria & Western RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1968
- Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959