Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Fiscal Court of Jefferson County

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1981No. 80-SC-857-DGPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

The issue we deal with on this appeal is the validity of a contract between the City of Louisville and certain property owners which attempts to settle a remonstrance suit.

In November of 1977, the City introduced an ordinance which proposed to annex a large area east of the city. The area included a regional shopping center, a large working farm, a residential subdivision, a smaller shopping center and office complex, several motels and an interstate highway service area. Two remonstrance suits were filed. 1 The suits were consolidated for trial, and the Jefferson County…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wabash Railroad v. DefianceSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Russman v. LuckettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  3. Holsclaw v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  4. Plant Food Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Jacobs v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wanzer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Mount Juneau Enterprises, Inc. v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
  4. Vermont Department of Public Service v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Town of Brockway v. City of Black River FallsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API