Jacobs v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LUKOWSKY, Justice.
This is the third stage of the evolutional development of urban-county government in Kentucky. The first stage is represented by our decision in Pinchback v. Stephens, Ky., 484 S.W.2d 327 (1972), in which we held that KRS Chapter 67A was not per se unconstitutional because this court could not say that every possible action taken under it would inevitably violate the constitution. Stage two is represented by our decision in Holsclaw v. Stephens, Ky., 507 S.W.2d 462 (1974), in which we upheld against constitutional attack most aspects of the plan merging the City of Lexington…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Payne v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Holsclaw v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
- Eminence Distillery Co. v. Henry County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Dallas County Community College District v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Edgewood Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization, Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- National Can Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.