Legal Opinion

Stockton v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 2, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, P. J.

This is an ejectment suit instituted by Stockton and others against Murray and others to recover 1,500 acres of land in Fentress and Morgan Counties and damages for timber cut and removed by the defendants.

The defendants denied that the complainants were the owners of said land or had title to it, and they denied that they had cut or removed any timber from lands owned by the complainants. De-fenant Charlie Murray denied that he had executed any deed for the land in controversy to S. W. Winningham, complainants’ predecessor in title, and alleged that if there was such deed it was obtained by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hitt v. Caney Fork Gulf Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Westmoreland v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  3. Harrison v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  4. Ruffin v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Willingham v. PotterTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mercy v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  2. Branstetter v. PoynterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  3. England v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API