Legal Opinion

Willingham v. Potter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM FENTRESS. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Fentress County. —A. H. Roberts, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

Ejectment. The chancellor sustained an objection to a certified copy of a deed introduced as a link in defendant Potter’s chain of title, on the ground that the certificate of acknowledgment was fatally defective. This certificate reads:

“State of Tennessee, Fentress County.
“Personally appeared before me Simeon Hinds, clerk of the county court for said county, Martha Wil-lingham, with whom I am personally acquainted, and acknowledged the foregoing deed to be her act and deed for the purposes therein contained. Given un^.der my hand at office in Jamestown this 13th day of 'July, 1875.

1 ‘ SimeoN…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schleicher, Admr. v. GatlinTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Watkins v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Cavender v. Heirs of SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  4. Bell v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chattanooga Lumber & Coal Corp. v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Minton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Lancaster v. Boatright (In Re Grable)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
  5. In Re Viking Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API