Legal Opinion
Willingham v. Potter
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions
FROM FENTRESS. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Fentress County. —A. H. Roberts, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
Ejectment. The chancellor sustained an objection to a certified copy of a deed introduced as a link in defendant Potter’s chain of title, on the ground that the certificate of acknowledgment was fatally defective. This certificate reads:
“State of Tennessee, Fentress County.
“Personally appeared before me Simeon Hinds, clerk of the county court for said county, Martha Wil-lingham, with whom I am personally acquainted, and acknowledged the foregoing deed to be her act and deed for the purposes therein contained. Given un^.der my hand at office in Jamestown this 13th day of 'July, 1875.
1 ‘ SimeoN…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schleicher, Admr. v. GatlinTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Watkins v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Cavender v. Heirs of SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
- Bell v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
3Cited by6 opinions
- Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Chattanooga Lumber & Coal Corp. v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Minton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Lancaster v. Boatright (In Re Grable)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
- In Re Viking Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.