Bell Holt McCall Co. v. Caplice
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to thirteen parcels of land in Ravalli county, being parcels designated in the pleadings as parcels 2 to 14 inclusive. By the pleadings H. 0. Bell seeks to have the title to parcel 1 quieted in him and his co-partners.
Plaintiff claimed to have acquired the property embraced in the parcels 2 to 14 and particularly described in the pleadings from the partnership of Bell, Reinbold & Viola M. Holt. In the chain of title there appears a deed made a few hours before his death by Harold L. Holt, one of the original partners, to Reinbold, another partner.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simpson v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Loring v. LoringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Goodloe v. WoodsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
- O'Donnell v. McCoolWashington Supreme Court · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
- Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950