Legal Opinion

Bell Holt McCall Co. v. Caplice

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1946No. 8647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to thirteen parcels of land in Ravalli county, being parcels designated in the pleadings as parcels 2 to 14 inclusive. By the pleadings H. 0. Bell seeks to have the title to parcel 1 quieted in him and his co-partners.

Plaintiff claimed to have acquired the property embraced in the parcels 2 to 14 and particularly described in the pleadings from the partnership of Bell, Reinbold & Viola M. Holt. In the chain of title there appears a deed made a few hours before his death by Harold L. Holt, one of the original partners, to Reinbold, another partner.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Simpson v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Loring v. LoringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Goodloe v. WoodsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  5. O'Donnell v. McCoolWashington Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API