Legal Opinion

Boam v. Greenman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1907No. Docket No. 52PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Ingham; Wiest, J. Bill by Andrew Boam and Louisa Boam against James Greenman, Minnie Oostigan, and Melzar Turner, administrator of the estate of Jacob D. Greenman, deceased, for the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is a suit instituted to compel the specific performance of an oral agreement alleged to have been made by complainants with Jacob D. Greenman, since deceased. The defendants are, respectively, a son, a daughter, and the administrator of the estate of said Jacob D. Greenman, deceased. The oral agreement, as stated in the bill of complaint, was as follows: That the said Jacob D. Greenman:

“Promised to complainants that, if they would return to his said farm and live there while he lived, allowing him to have one-half of the proceeds of the farm, by doing such work as his health might permit…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Cramer's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tincknell v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Vandercook v. KurtzMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bell v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API