Legal Opinion

Tincknell v. Ward

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1938No. Docket No. 81, Calendar No. 40,000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

On January 14, 1936, William Tincknell, a resident of Macomb county, died intestate at the age of 85. He was survived by two children as heirs-at-law, a son, Arthur, and a daughter, Mrs. Anna Ward. At his death William Tincknell left an estate free from debt which was appraised at nearly $43,000. There were two farms, one of 50 acres appraised at $3,000, the other, 180 acres, appraised at $7,500. For many years the 50-acre farm had been occupied by Mrs. Ward and her family, and the 180-acre place had been occupied jointly by deceased and his wife who died in 1928, and the son Arthur Tincknell…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Houten v. VorceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Groening v. McCambridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Snider v. SchafferMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Moyer v. HafnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Sieg v. SendelbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Czeizler v. RadkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rodstrom v. StrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Vandercook v. KurtzMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API