Legal Opinion

Taft v. Taft

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1965No. 43359PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodgers, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, wherein a former consent decree was opened and set aside because of fraud alleged to have been prepetrated upon the court in the procurement of the previous decree by the appellant, Albert J. Taft. Appellee cross-appealed upon the ground that the decree opening the former decree was erroneous because it did not fully reinstate the former decree.

A synopsis of the events leading up to the final decree is necessary. Mr. and Mrs. Albert J. Taft were married in 1942, and are the parents of three children: one…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grenada Auto Co. v. WaldropMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Road Material & Equipment Co. v. McGowanMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Carter v. Eastman-Gardner Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Robinson v. McShaneMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  5. New York Life Ins. Co. v. GillMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Monsanto Co. v. CochranMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Whiteway Finance Co. v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Barrett v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Dogan v. DoganCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API