Legal Opinion
Brock v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided March 21, 1997No. 95-444PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
The pro se appellant, Vietnam veteran Richard M. Brock, appeals a May 3, 1995, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) denying service connection for disabilities claimed as residuals of exposure to the defoliant Agent Orange during the Vietnam conflict. The BVA decision determined that he had not met the initial burden of submitting a well-grounded claim. Record (R.) at 9. The appellant has filed an informal brief and reply brief. The Secretary has filed a motion for summary affirmance. Summary disposition is not appropriate here because the outcome is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Frankel v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Murphy v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Velez v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- James P. G Utierrez v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
- Winters v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Clyburn v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Arms v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.