Entwhistle v. Feighner
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Gentry Circuit .Court. cited Looker .vs..Davis, ,45 Mo. 145 ; State-, etc. vs; Meagher,. 44 Mot 356;-Poa vs. Domic, et al., 54-Mo. 123.; : -■
1Opinion of the Court
"Wagner. Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court;’
• ,Plaintiff brought her .-action' under the statute tp recover damages ,.of; the. defendant,. -for wrongfully killing, her- bus-, band.
*215The only objections urged to the action of the court relate to its rulings, in admitting and rejecting testimony.
Plaintiff gave evidence of the declarations of the deceased husband immediately after he received the injury, and they were objected to, but they were clearly admissible within the principle established in Brownell vs. Pacific R. R. Co., (47 Mo. 239) and Harriman vs. Stowe (57 Mo. 93), and this is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harriman v. StoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Brownell v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
3Cited by15 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- City of Galveston v. BarbourTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Jordan v. St. Joseph Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- McComb v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.