Legal Opinion

Clay v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 14, 2007No. 06-7926 SCPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Deborah Clay, individually and as the successor in interest to the estate of Rodney Clay, Rodney Clay, Jr., Velicia Hamilton, Tamiko Moon, and Thomasina Clay (“Plaintiffs”) brought this suit against the Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (“Health Plan”) (collectively “Defendants” or “Kaiser”), asserting nine claims related to Kaiser’s alleged mishandling of a kidney transplant for Rodney Clay. See Notice of Removal, Docket…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ruiz v. PodolskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Woodall v. AVALON CARE CENTER-FEDERAL WAYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Woodall v. Avalon Care Center—Federal Way, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Phillips v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API