Legal Opinion

United States v. McCullough

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 22, 1995No. 4:94 CR 0202Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants, Lawrence McCullough and Mitchell McCullough, are charged in a 29-count indictment with violations of the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. § 3371, et seq. Lawrence McCullough is charged in nine counts and Mitchell McCullough is charged in twenty-five counts. The charges generally involve defendants’ alleged purchase and export of ginseng without the certification and record-keeping required by state law. Upon order of the Court, the government also filed a bill of particulars (Docket No. 15).

Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API