State v. Burgins
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGrey, P. J.
This is an appeal from the Ross County Court of Common Pleas. Defendant-appellant, John Burgins, was convicted of the theft of two cameras from a drug store. He appeals, designating one assignment of error:
“Appellant was denied the effective assistance of counsel as a result of his trial counsel’s statements to the jury concerning appellant’s guilt and counsel’s [indication of his] disbelief of his testimony.”
The facts are essentially not disputed. Burgins was noticed by two employees of Super X Drugs who were suspicious of his behavior. Burgins put two 35mm cameras in a shopping cart. Later,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. WoullardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. Saleh, 07ap-431 (3-31-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. GuyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. KennardOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. GreerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.