Legal Opinion

State v. Burgins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1988No. 1418PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrey, P. J.

This is an appeal from the Ross County Court of Common Pleas. Defendant-appellant, John Burgins, was convicted of the theft of two cameras from a drug store. He appeals, designating one assignment of error:

“Appellant was denied the effective assistance of counsel as a result of his trial counsel’s statements to the jury concerning appellant’s guilt and counsel’s [indication of his] disbelief of his testimony.”

The facts are essentially not disputed. Burgins was noticed by two employees of Super X Drugs who were suspicious of his behavior. Burgins put two 35mm cameras in a shopping cart. Later,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. WoullardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. Saleh, 07ap-431 (3-31-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. GuyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. KennardOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. GreerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API