Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Manchester Memorial Hospital

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 18, 1995No. 12453PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered, after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly *472(1) limited cross-examination of the defendants’ expert witness and (2) denied her challenge of a juror for cause. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. The plaintiff suffered a fall in her home that required her to be transported by ambulance to the emergency room at the defendant Manchester Memorial Hospital. The defendant Wells Jacobson was the orthopedic physician assigned to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. State v. SteigerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Martins v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Richmond v. LongoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Irish v. GimbelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. Armstrong v. HrabalWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Musorofiti v. VlcekConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API