Legal Opinion
State v. Pierce
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided December 27, 1983No. 82-2124PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON MYSE,
Reserve Judge. This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. Sec. 974.06, Stats. Appellant sought relief from his resentencing which imposed a term of two years’ imprisonment. We affirm the trial court’s order but remand for recomputation of credit for time served.
The trial court initially sentenced appellant for a battery conviction as a “repeater” under sec. 939.62(1) (a), Stats., to two years’ probation, consecutive to probation then being served. While serving his probation, appellant was charged with two more batteries. The first…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SepulvedaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- State v. SollesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- State v. SchwebkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.