Legal Opinion

State v. Burt

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 25, 2000No. 99-1209-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P.J.

¶ 1. Frank James Burt, Jr. appeals from a judgment convicting him of first-degree reckless homicide, attempted armed robbery by the use of force and armed robbery by threat of force, all party-to-a-crime, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Burt argues that the trial court violated the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions when it amended his sentence on the day of sentencing after determining that it had mistakenly used the word "concurrent" instead of "con secutive" in its original sentence pronouncement. We disagree and affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. State v. PerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GruetzmacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Jacqueline R. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. WillettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. State v. Jacqueline R. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API