Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Newbold

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Sharp, J.) '

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

The appellants sued the appellee in assumpsit in the Superior Court of Baltimore City upon his written guaranty hereinafter mentioned. The declaration contained the common money counts and a special count on the guaranty.

The appellee pleaded nil debet, non assumpsit and, by way of further plea, that the guaranty declared on was a collateral one under which he as guarantor was entitled to prompt notice of the default of one Jacob A. Smith who was the principal debtor, but that he had not received such notice until nearly three years after the default, wherefore and because the plaintiff, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Bell v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. Hooper v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Mauran v. BullusSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Heyman v. DooleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Booth v. Irving National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Hodgson v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Auburn Shale Brick Co. v. Cowan Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  4. United Railways & Electric Co. v. RosikCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API