Legal Opinion

H. E. Westerman Lumber Co. v. Raschke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1926No. 25,159PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Action to recover for building materials alleged to have been sold to defendants and used by them in the construction of a dwelling-house upon their farm which they occupy as a homestead. Subsequent to the commencement of this action, plaintiff filed affidavit in attachment and procured a writ and the homestead was levied upon thereunder. Thereafter defendants moved for an order vacating the writ upon the ground that the affidavit was insufficient under the provisions of G. S. 1923, § 9343. The court granted the motion and set aside the writ. From such order, plaintiff appealed.

Ir lieu of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hasey v. McMullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Nickerson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Bagley v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. E. Westerman Lumber Co. v. RaschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Keys v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. In Re CroceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  4. Anderson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API