Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Anderson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1940No. 32,448Published

1ConcurrencePeterson, Justice

I concur in the result. Plaintiffs’ claim is neither a lien nor a charge on the homestead. It- is a mere debt, which can become a lien only by the recovery and docketing of a judgment or by attachment. We so held in In re Estate of Peterson, 198 Minn. 45, 268 N. W. 707, where we construed the new probate code, L. 1935, c. 72, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1940 Supp. § 8992-1, et seq. That case merely follows the rule of our prior decisions in such cases as H. E. Westerman Lbr. Co. v. Raschke, 167 Minn. 243, 208 N. W. 960; Hasey v. McMullen, 109 Minn. 332, 123 N. W. 1078; Nickerson v. Crawford, 74 Minn.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hasey v. McMullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Nickerson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Bagley v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. In Re Estate of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Ramstadt v. ThunemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API