Legal Opinion

In Re Mulholland

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1910No. Crim. No. 143PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of habeas corpus to the sheriff of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In the above-entitled matter it appears that petitioner was convicted in the justice’s court of Sacramento-township, Sacramento county, for violating the act of the legislature approved March 6, 1909 (Stats. 1909, p. 140), prohibiting the mooring and anchoring of house boats in rivers and streams of this state within certain limits.

It is averred in the petition for the writ that “the said matter came on for hearing before the superior court of the county of Sacramento, state of California, and after consideration by the same the said judgment of the said justice court was by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re BarlowIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Jones v. KeyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API