Johnston v. Interstate Railroad
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION WIDENER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has instituted this action to review his being removed and held out of service by defendant. He also seeks to have reviewed the decision of the National Railroad Adjustment Board sustaining defendant’s action in holding plaintiff out of service. The relief sought by plaintiff includes reinstatement with seniority and payment of $100,000.00 on a monthly rate from October 8, 1968, the date he was allegedly first wrongfully withheld from service.
Plaintiff contends that his employer’s action in withholding him from service violates Rule 23 of a collective…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brady v. Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Sheehan v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1976
- Merinuk v. BakerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973