Legal Opinion

Coto Settlement v. Ian Eisenberg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 29, 2010No. 08-35966Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COTO SETTLEMENT,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 08-35966 v.  D.C. No. 08-cv-00125-RSM IAN EISENBERG and OLYMPIC OPINION TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellees..  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 14, 2009—Seattle, Washington Filed January 29, 2010 Before: Richard D. Cudahy,* Senior Circuit Judge, Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Cudahy *The…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API