Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State Board of Equalization

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1948No. 8766PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal from a judgment in mandamus proceedings, directing the defendant board to approve a claim of $639.50 with interest for refund of gasoline license tax paid on gasoline lost in transit. The gasoline was purchased by the California Company, a gasoline dealer in Montana, from the Texas Company, a corporation engaged in the business of refining gasoline at Sunburst and placed in two tank cars for shipment by relator. One car was consigned to Great Falls Line, Great Falls, and the other to the California Company at Butte; both ears were derailed in transit and the entire contents…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. RaynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Griffin v. GreeneMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Champlin Refining Co. v. CruseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Allen v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daimlerchrysler Services North America, LLC v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Slater Corp. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Roeder v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State ex rel. Roeder v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API