Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Roeder v. State Board of Equalization

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1958No. 9568Published

1Dissent

MR. JUSTICE ADAIR:

(dissenting)

In State ex rel. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, Appeal No. 8766, 121 Mont. 583, 594, 194 Pac. (2d) 627, 633,-decided by a divided court, I concurred in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Choate wherein it was cor*402rectly stated that “If claims of this sort are allowed there is no way whereby the inspectors for the board can determine the extent and amount of such losses. * # * If dealers desire to protect themselves against such losses they may do so by securing contracts of insurance but the State of Montana has not insured them against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Ford, Comm'r RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API