State of New Hampshire v. Alex Ducharme
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.
The defendant, Alex Ducharme, appeals his conviction, following a bench trial, for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI). See RSA 265-A:2 (Supp. 2012) (amended 2012). He argues that the Circuit Court (Stephen, J.) erred when it: (1) ruled that the police had probable cause to arrest him for DUI; (2) concluded that a valid arrest for DUI had occurred and, therefore, that the implied consent statute applied; (3) admitted evidence obtained after he had invoked his Miranda rights and failed to consider the “confusion doctrine”; and (4) found the evidence sufficient to convict…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- McKenna v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- State v. LeavittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Sean McInnisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State v. Remi Gross-SantosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State v. Jean Claude MfatanezaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- State of New Hampshire v. Bryan Weston LuikartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
- State of New Hampshire v. Bryan Weston LuikartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021