Legal Opinion

State of New Hampshire v. Alex Ducharme

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 12, 2015No. 2014-0025PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.

The defendant, Alex Ducharme, appeals his conviction, following a bench trial, for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI). See RSA 265-A:2 (Supp. 2012) (amended 2012). He argues that the Circuit Court (Stephen, J.) erred when it: (1) ruled that the police had probable cause to arrest him for DUI; (2) concluded that a valid arrest for DUI had occurred and, therefore, that the implied consent statute applied; (3) admitted evidence obtained after he had invoked his Miranda rights and failed to consider the “confusion doctrine”; and (4) found the evidence sufficient to convict…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. McKenna v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. State v. LeavittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Sean McInnisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  2. State v. Remi Gross-SantosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  3. State v. Jean Claude MfatanezaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  4. State of New Hampshire v. Bryan Weston LuikartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
  5. State of New Hampshire v. Bryan Weston LuikartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API