Legal Opinion

Angelina MATTA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 9, 1986No. 86-1237PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue here is whether claimant has the necessary number of quarters of coverage. She needs 26, but the Secretary, disbelieving claimant’s contention that she has been self-employed in her home for many years selling cookies, candies, ices, and coconuts, found she had only 15. The Secretary’s decision is clearly supported by substantial evidence.

Claimant first applied for benefits in 1975. She stated that she had inquired in 1972 about coverage, had been told she needed more quarters, and had been advised to start her own business. She then began selling candy and coconuts and other items…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Hunter A. GARDNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bahija JABBAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Betancourt Betancourt v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1991
  3. Biddulph v. CallahanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  4. Blohm v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1991
  5. Menapace v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API