Penn-Harris-Madison School Corp. v. Joy
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Statement of the Case
Penn-Harris-Madison School Corporation (Penn) challenges the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Tianna Joy, four other students, and two parents of Penn students (collectively, the Students), after the court found that Penn's drug testing program violated the Search and Seizure Clause-Article 1, Seetion 11 of the Indiana Constitution (Section 11). Because this case presents an issue of great public concern, we find the case is not moot despite the graduation of the students. With respect to the summary judgment, we find no reversible…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of LawranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Board of Education of Downers Grove Grade School District No. 58 v. Steven L. And Christine L., Individually and as Parents of Andrew L., a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Jeffrey Stotts v. Community Unit School District No. 1, Thomas F. Leahy, Mike KindhartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sharp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana v. Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai'i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2023