Legal Opinion
Myer Sankary v. Nina Ringgold
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2015No. 13-55063UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
The Appellants, Nina Ringgold and Justin Lockhart, appeal from the district court’s order remanding this case to state court. The Appellants challenge: (1) the district court’s refusal to allow Nina Ring-gold to file a notice of joinder; (2) the denial of the Appellants’ application to disqualify the judge; (3) the decision to remand; and (4) the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to the Appellee.
We have jurisdiction to review the remand order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). We have jurisdiction to review the other issues raised on appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Georgia v. RachelSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jagdishbhai and Hansaben Patel v. Del Taco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 352 Capital GP LLC v. WearDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Arnhoelter v. KausDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Progressive Direct Insurance Company d/b/a Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. GerkenDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020