Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

By this application the receiver in this action seeks compensation for services rendered and disbursements expended. He was appointed for the benefit of plaintiff in respect to a certain trust fund held by the Farmers Loan and Trust Company, as trustee for defendant. He qualified, paid the premiums on the bond, had various conferences with plaintiff’s attorney, appeared upon the argument to vacate the receivership, caused certain papers to be served on the trustee’s attorneys and performed various other acts incident to his office. The trust company moved to vacate the receivership order, but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McHarg v. Commonwealth Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amusement Distributors, Inc. v. Oz Forum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. City of New York v. Big Six Towers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API