Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Big Six Towers, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles Margett, J.
In this application to terminate the receivership and settle the account of the receiver, the parties have agreed that the court determine not only the amounts payable to the receiver and his attorney, but that the court shall make a determination as to who shall bear the costs and expenses of the receivership.
This foreclosure action was commenced on November 19, 1968 by the filing of a lis pendens and service of a summons and complaint. By order of the same date, this court appointed a receiver, who then duly qualified by filing his oath and undertaking. The receiver, by order to show cause…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stevenson v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Matter of WeitlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of LongNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- McHarg v. Commonwealth Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coronet Capital Co. v. SpodekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- New York State Mortgage Loan Enforcement & Administration Corp v. Milbank Site One Houses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Amusement Distributors, Inc. v. Oz Forum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. Abbott Manor Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Jakubowicz v. A.C. Green Electrical Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.