Legal Opinion

Bluthenthal & Bickart, Inc. v. Crowley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1910No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, William Crowley, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 18th day of March, 1910, vacating an order for the examination of the plaintiff before trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

The plaintiff is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. It moved to vacate the order for its examination before trial and seeks to sustain the order appealed from on the sole ground that it is a foreign corporation. We have been unable to find any provision of the Code of Civil Procedure, and none has been called to our attention, which grants a foreign corporation, suing in the courts of this State, immunity from examination before trial, and we know of no reason why sections 870 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure are not as applicable to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Weinberg v. Berkshire Ice Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Bluthenthal & Bickart, Inc. v. CrowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API