Legal Opinion

Bluthenthal & Bickart, Inc. v. Crowley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1910No. 1Published

Appeal by the defendant, William Crowley, from an order of tlie Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term- and entered in the office of the. clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of March,-1910,. granting the plaintiffs motion for a bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the Court

Millek, J.:

The complaint sets up two causes of action, one on an account stated and one to recover the agreed price on a sale and delivery of a quantity of liquors. The answer sets up various agreements to extend the time of payment, and also -pleads as a counterclaim - that there were shortages in the quantity of liquor actually contained in *844the packages delivered, from the. amounts at which they were billed to the plaintiff. The order appealed from required the defendant to state the time and place of the making of the various agreements set forth, and the items and amount, of shortages in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bluthenthal & Bickart, Inc. v. CrowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API