Legal Opinion
Pere Marquette Ry. Co. v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 7, 1928No. 4008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Defendant in error, as administrator of Mary Anderson, deceased, brought this action for damages for her death, caused by a collision between the coupé in which she was riding and a passenger train of plaintiff in error.
The accident occurred at a crossing of a highway and the railroad, in the state of Indiana. The declaration was in three counts. The first alleged as the act of negligence the failure to install and maintain an automatic signal bell at the crossing; the second alleged that plaintiff in error “drove, managed and operated the train so negligently,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co. v. SellarsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Baltimore & O. R. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Bergman v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roth v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Stephenson v. Grand Trunk Western R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Constantine v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co. v. DivineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- Bocock v. Wabash R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.