Legal Opinion
Neill v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 18, 2003No. 03-214Published
1Opinion of the Court
139 S.W.3d 484 (2003)
355 Ark. 474
Lamar NEILL and Rose Neill
v.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.
No. 03-214.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
December 18, 2003.
Gibson Law Office, by: C.S. "Chuck" Gibson, Dermott, for appellants.
Harrison, Watts, Donovan & Tilley, P.A., by: Jim Tilley and Michael McLarty, Little Rock, for appellee.
JIM HANNAH, Justice.
Lamar Neill appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company finding a policy was void ab initio because the insurance application signed by Neill and prepared by an agent of Nationwide indicated Neill had no…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Cole v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Curanovic v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Carmichael v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.