Legal Opinion

LANCASTER v. THE NEW JERSEY TRANSIT SYSTEM

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 9, 2023No. 1:20-cv-01995Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Paul Lancaster, 1:20-cv-01995-NLH-MJS Plaintiff, OPINION v. Jennifer Piccoli, Chuck Hellyer, Andre Coleman, Alexis Allen, and Kevin O’Neill, Defendants. Appearances: PAUL LANCASTER 1 MARKET ST. APT. 660 CAMDEN, N.J. 08102 Plaintiff Appearing Pro Se AZEEM M. CHAUDRY NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 25 MARKET ST. P.O. BOX 112 TRENTON, N.J. 08625 On behalf of Defendant Kevin O’Neill HILLMAN, District Judge Pending before the Court is Defendant Kevin O’Neill’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint of Plaintiff Paul Lancaster…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Karen Malleus v. John GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API