Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Davis (In re Davis)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina

Decided July 26, 2013No. C/A No. 11-07525-dd; Adv. Pro. No. 12-80034-ddPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chapter 7

ORDER

David R. Duncan, Chief US Bankruptcy Judge

This adversary proceeding comes before the Court on the amended complaint of the plaintiffs, Andrew Taylor and Naomi Taylor (“Plaintiffs”), seeking a determination that a debt owed to them by the debtor and defendant, Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr. (“Defendant”) is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(4), and (a)(6). Jurisdiction for this proceeding is premised upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(a). This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). Venue of this adversary proceeding is proper…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. K&M Elec. Servs., Inc. v. Vito (In re Vito)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  2. Davis v. Kohler (In re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
  3. Arguedas v. OllisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
  4. Chapman v. OllisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
  5. Potts-Schlimme v. Zamani-ZadehUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API