Navarra v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
FEIKENS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs seek a determination as to the applicability of the Michigan eavesdropping statute, M.C.L.A. §§ 750.539 et seq.; M.S.A. 28.807 et seq., to the testimony of a person who has listened to a telephone conversation with the permission of one party. For the reasons discussed below, I have decided that the testimony of Mr. Norris in the arbitration proceeding would violate the statute and he would thus be subject to criminal prosecution and civil penalties. BACKGROUND
Navarra contends that he ordered his broker at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- List Interactive, Ltd. v. Knights of ColumbusDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- Four Flags Cablevision v. MaynardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985