Legal Opinion

Four Flags Cablevision v. Maynard

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1985No. Docket No. 79294Published

1Opinion of the CourtW. R. Peterson, J.

Plaintiff is in the business of transmitting signals through coaxial cables and offers a service commonly known as cable television for which it has a nonexclusive franchise to operate within certain areas. Unlike public UHF or VHF television broadcasters, whose transmissions may be received without charge by any member of the public who owns a television set, plaintiff’s programming cannot be received by the owner of a television set without paying for plaintiff’s coaxial cable service and a converter.

Plaintiff provides various program services at various prices to television set owners who…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. White v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. YeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ciminelli v. CablevisionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API